Research, updates, and insights from the frontlines of AI accountability.

8
min read
OpenAI’s research is too important to be turned into propaganda
As we enter a new era of AI capabilities, OpenAI is facing increased pressure to spin its research in self-serving ways.

5
min read
A pro-AI, dark-money group tied to David Sacks appears linked to a new astroturfing campaign
Another round of suspiciously coordinated posting suggests a paid campaign to benefit Innovation Council Action, the $100 million advocacy group fighting for AI deregulation.

5
min read
SpaceXAI just released Grok 4.5. It may have broken California’s AI law in the process.
The potential violation by SpaceXAI, punishable by fines up to $1 million, will serve as an early test of whether California's new AI safety law actually has teeth.

5
min read
A Pro-AI Super PAC's Secret Meme Sockpuppets
An OpenAI/a16z-affiliated super PAC appears to be linked to multiple sockpuppet accounts, attacking and parodying their opponents with lewd and offensive memes.

3
min read
The Midas Project Joins Coalition Warning about xAI’s Track Record in light of SpaceX’s IPO
The Midas Project, alongside a coalition including Encode, Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology, and Guidelight AI Standards, released "xAI: The Unpriced Risk in SpaceX's IPO."

5
min read
Is OpenAI’s super PAC paying for an army of Twitter bots to engage with their content?
The firm at the center of OpenAI and a16z’s political operation seems to be spamming social media with pornographic bots, inflating engagement on their clients’ accounts.

5
min read
Why is Anthropic’s training data disclosure AI-generated?
Anthropic and its peers don’t seem to be taking California’s data transparency law seriously.

5
min read
The reporters at this news site are AI bots. OpenAI’s super PAC appears to be funding it.
An interview request from a bot posing as a reporter revealed an AI-generated news site with articles attacking AI industry critics. For the second time this month, we found links to Targeted Victory, the firm at the center of OpenAI's $125 million political operation.

5
min read
Is this OpenAI’s anonymous Twitter sockpuppet account?
An anonymous account spent months attacking OpenAI’s critics with misleading claims and paid ads. We found links to Targeted Victory, the firm at the center of OpenAI's $125 million political operation.

5
min read
AI companies are testing the limits of their own safety commitments
The companies building the most powerful AI systems aren't following their own rules — and no one is making them.

5
min read
OpenAI made a Pentagon deal overnight. Did anyone ask their safety committee?
A 24-hour Pentagon deal tested a key safeguard OpenAI promised would survive its pivot to for-profit.

5
min read
Elon Musk is now enabling the autonomous killbots he once said should never exist
xAI’s acceptance of a controversial deal with the Pentagon marks a significant first step towards AI-powered lethal autonomous weapons and domestic mass surveillance.
There are no articles based on these filters. Please try searching again.
Our projects expose corner-cutting and push for accountability to ensure AI serves the public interest.
We lead targeted investigations and advocacy efforts to promote transparency, expose risks, and ensure that frontier AI is being developed responsibly.
Deeply researched analysis of how the AI industry engages with policymakers to shape regulatory debates and influence public decision-making.
More than 100 prominent AI experts, former OpenAI staff, public figures, and civil society groups signed an open letter calling for greater transparency from OpenAI in August 2025 during its major restructuring that reduced nonprofit control.
Released in June 2025, The OpenAI Files is the most comprehensive collection to date of publicly documented concerns with governance practices, leadership integrity, and organizational culture at OpenAI.
At the 2024 AI Safety Summit in Seoul, South Korea, sixteen leading tech organizations pledged to implement "red line" risk evaluation policies for frontier AI models. The deadline has now arrived, but not everyone has lived up to their commitment. This tracker assesses progress across the five key components.
The Unpriced Risk in SpaceX’s IPO Co-authored with Guidelight AI Standards, LASST, and Encode AI, this report documents xAI’s safety record and the disclosures SpaceX investors should demand ahead of the company’s IPO.
Watchtower tracks when AI companies change their safety policies — and when they break them. Click any entry for further details.
Aug 18, 2026
OpenAI updated its Model Spec, the document outlining intended model behavior
Read WatchtowerAug 17, 2026
xAI updated Grok 4.6's model card after release. A changelog was included.
Read WatchtowerAug 3, 2026
OpenAI updated its system card for two of its models: GPT 5.6 and GPT Live.
Read WatchtowerJul 20, 2026
xAI made changes throughout the model card for Grok 4.5, including some that appear to be persistent errors
Read WatchtowerJul 11, 2026
xAI rewrote and shortened its Frontier AI Framework removing whistleblower protection language and references to California's SB 53.
Read WatchtowerFrequently asked questions
Have more questions? Our team is happy to help, contact us.
We engage in a combination of research, outreach, and public advocacy to ensure that AI companies are meeting public expectations and living up to their past promises, in order to ensure responsible AI development and deployment.
We review technical literature, regulatory guidance, and case studies to distill concrete measures that will meaningfully improve public safety — such as frontier-model risk assessments, red-teaming requirements, and whistle-blower protections — and advocate for the most important voluntary steps that companies can take today to ensure they are acting responsibly.
We also monitor whether companies follow their stated policies and industry norms. When we find evidence of back-tracking or inadequate risk controls, we document it and call for corrective action — mobilizing employees, customers, and civil-society allies until the company adopts the necessary safeguards.
Finally, we publicize our research to inform the public of how AI companies stack up on safety and responsibility. We release our work in the form of scorecards, independent reports, open letters, and long-form writing so that regulators, investors, and the wider public can see how individual developers perform on safety and responsibility.
Various AI experts including Nick Bostrom and Stuart Russell have compared the development of advanced AI to the myth of King Midas.
According to legend, King Midas was once granted one wish by the god Dionysus: that everything he touched would turn to gold. At first, he was thrilled with his new powers. But the King soon discovered that he couldn’t touch food, water, or even his family without instantly turning them to metal. In other words, he got exactly what he wanted in pursuit of immense wealth — and it turned out it wasn’t what he wanted at all.
Much like King Midas, AI companies are now eagerly pursuing incredible wealth and power by developing increasingly powerful AI systems. But ensuring that these systems act in alignment with our values is still an unsolved technical problem. If we misspecify even a single goal for these systems, how will we prevent them from causing an incredible catastrophe – if they follow our instructions at all?
In the words of Stuart Russell, “If you continue on the current path, the better AI gets, the worse things get for us. For any given incorrectly stated objective, the better a system achieves that objective, the worse it is.” The Midas Project exists to ensure that AI companies do not take this extraordinary gamble without public accountability and oversight.
The Midas Project is a nonprofit organization founded in early 2024 by Tyler Johnston. Our work is supported by a small core team and a wider base of volunteers and supporters. We are a nonprofit, tax-exempt, 501(c)(3) organization that relies on donations from the public.
No. One of our central values is being pro-technology.
Progress in technology has improved lives for millions of people around the globe (after all, without it, we wouldn’t have penicillin, air conditioning, or the internet). Artificial intelligence is already being used to help improve medicine, education, and overall living standards. We believe this progress should continue, and we hope AI will be a positive force in the world.
But we may not be on track to realize this future. Without technical breakthroughs, we risk developing powerful AI systems that act against user intent, or can be misused by bad actors to cause tremendous harm. Powerful AI could also concentrate unprecedented power among a handful of AI companies and exacerbate social inequality. To avoid these downsides, AI must be developed with caution, transparency, and public oversight. That’s why The Midas Project is committed to raising awareness about the risks of AI and ensuring that everyone is given a chance to make their voice heard.
If you’d like to get involved, consider signing up for our newsletter, joining as an official volunteer, or making a charitable donation today.
You can email us at info@themidasproject.com, or reach out via the form on our contact page.















