Announcing the Seoul Commitment Tracker
Our report reveals that most AI companies are breaking the safety promises they made to the world last year.
2
min read

This month The Midas Project released our newest report, the Seoul Commitment Tracker. Our report reveals that most AI companies are breaking the safety promises they made to the world last year.
The Seoul Tracker evaluates sixteen leading AI companies that promised to implement safety frameworks at the 2024 AI Seoul Summit. The results are concerning: not a single company earned better than a “B-” grade. Even worse, six companies received failing “F” marks for completely neglecting their commitments.
Even among companies that did create safety policies, many are using vague language and setting extremely high thresholds before safety measures kick in. This means dangerous AI capabilities might develop without proper safeguards in place.
The report found that companies like Meta, xAI, and Mistral AI have particularly fallen short, failing to fully implement a risk management policy as promised. However, the Seoul Tracker does highlight some positive steps: several companies including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have begun addressing serious risks that AI safety experts have warned about, such as AI systems being used to design biological weapons or launch cyberattacks. Some are also monitoring for concerning capabilities like model autonomy – where AI systems might act independently in unexpected ways.
For everyday people, this matters because these AI systems are rapidly becoming more powerful and integrated into our lives. Without proper safety guardrails, we risk creating technologies that could be harmful or uncontrollable. The report serves as a wake-up call that public pressure and government oversight remain essential to ensure AI development benefits everyone, not just tech companies’ bottom lines.
Research, updates, and insights from the frontlines of AI accountability.
We lead strategic initiatives to monitor tech companies, counter corporate propaganda.
5
min read
A pro-AI, dark-money group tied to David Sacks appears linked to a new astroturfing campaign
5
min read
SpaceXAI just released Grok 4.5. It may have broken California’s AI law in the process.
5
min read
A Pro-AI Super PAC's Secret Meme Sockpuppets

3
min read
The Midas Project Joins Coalition Warning about xAI’s Track Record in light of SpaceX’s IPO
The Midas Project, alongside a coalition including Encode, Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology, and Guidelight AI Standards, released "xAI: The Unpriced Risk in SpaceX's IPO."
Frequently asked questions
Have more questions? Our team is happy to help, contact us.
We engage in a combination of research, outreach, and public advocacy to ensure that AI companies are meeting public expectations, and living up to their past promises, when it comes to ensuring responsible AI development and deployment.
The most important component of our work is helping to identify and disseminate industry best practices for AI development. We review technical literature, regulatory guidance, and case studies to distill concrete measures—such as frontier-model risk assessments, red-teaming requirements, audit regimes, and whistle-blower protections—and advocate for the most important voluntary steps that companies can take today to ensure they are acting responsible.
We also monitor whether companies follow their stated policies and industry norms. When evidence shows back-tracking or inadequate controls, we document these gaps and publicly press for corrective action—mobilizing employees, customers, and civil-society allies until the company adopts the necessary safeguards.
Finally, we publicize our research to help ensure the public is aware of how AI developers stack up on safety and responsibility. We release concise scorecards, incident analyses, and memos so that regulators, investors, and the wider public can see how individual developers perform on safety and responsibility.
Various AI experts including Nick Bostrom and Stuart Russell have compared the development of advanced AI to the myth of King Midas.
According to the legend, King Midas once asked a powerful satyr to make it so that whatever he touched instantly turned into gold. At first, he was thrilled with his new powers. But the King soon discovered that he couldn’t touch food, water, or even his family without instantly turning them to metal. In other words, the sudden attainment of an incredible power with insufficiently well-specified goals and safeguards led to a terrible tragedy.
Much like King Midas, tech companies are now eagerly pursuing incredible wealth and power by developing artificial intelligence, a technology that will change our world forever. But how will we know that it is designed in alignment with our collective human values? If we misspecify even a single goal or safeguard for these systems, how will we prevent them from causing an incredible catastrophe?
In the words of Stuart Russell, “If you continue on the current path, the better AI gets, the worse things get for us. For any given incorrectly stated objective, the better a system achieves that objective, the worse it is.”
The Midas Project is a nonprofit organization founded in early 2024 by Tyler Johnston. Our work is supported by a small core team and a wider base of volunteers and supporters. We are a nonprofit, tax-exempt, 501(c)(3) organization that relies on donations from the public.
No. One of our central values is a pro-technology attitude.
Progress in technology has improved lives for millions of people around the globe (after all, without it, we wouldn’t have penicillin, air conditioning, or the internet). Artificial intelligence is already being used by millions to help improve medicine, education, and overall living standards. We believe this progress should continue, and we hope AI will be a positive force in the world.
However, we are also realists — and skeptical realists at that. We believe advanced AI systems may be a “dual-use” technology that can be used for harm as well. In order to avert social inequality, concentration of power, or AI-driven catastrophes, everybody needs to have a voice at the table when decisions about development and deployment are being made.
Currently, the vast majority of these decisions about the future of AI are being made in shadowy corporate boardrooms with little oversight and accountability. That’s why The Midas Project is committed to raising awareness about the risks of AI, and ensuring that global citizens are given a chance to make their voice heard.
If you’d like to get involved, consider signing up for our newsletter, joining as an official volunteer, or making a charitable donation today.
You can email us at info@themidasproject.com, or reach out via the form on our contact page.