Watchtower

Watchtower tracks when AI companies change their safety policies — and when they break them.

Anthropic

Anthropic updated its Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) from v3.3 to v3.4. Including changes to the Automated R&D "dramatic acceleration" trigger and adjusting Risk

Moderate
Change

Anthropic

Jul 8, 2026

Anthropic updated its Responsible Scaling policy from v3.3 to v3.4. The previous wording required observing or expecting double the rate of progress relative to the rate expected in the absence of significant AI contributions to AI R&D. V3.4 now requires doubling relative to both that expected rate and the fastest rate of extended progress previously observed in the absence of significant AI contributions, with a new footnote defining "extended" as spanning at least three model generations. A related clause was changed from trends that "could" lead to greater acceleration to trends that "seem likely to" do so. The stated rationale is that under v3.3, the threshold could trigger even if overall progress were flat or slowing, so long as progress was estimated to be dramatically faster than it would be without advanced AI tools, which Anthropic argues does not indicate the onset of recursive self-improvement, since deceleration from non-AI factors could plausibly continue to offset acceleration from AI-driven gains. The mitigations tied to the threshold are unchanged.

V3.4 also includes multiple changes to Risk Reports. The first change is to its scope, a report will now cover the risks of Anthropic’s models and actions as of a given coverage date, which will be no more than 30 days prior to the reports publication. This includes both publicly deployed models and internally deployed models that meet specific requirements. The second change was around redactions in the Risk Reports, adding a clause that they also aim to minimize redactions of the versions of the report shared with “all regular-clearance Anthropic employees.” Anthropic also added that they would disclose the existence of each redaction made in the public version of the report and aim to give a brief justification for such redactions. v3.4 also adds a clause that Risk Reports will be shared with “at least one external reviewer, but we may choose to split the review process across different external reviewers based on subject matter expertise.” Finally, v3.4 changes who sees the final, unredacted Risk Reports; they now set a number, at least 200 Anthropic employees. They will also share a minimally-redacted version with all of Anthropic’s regular-clearance staff. Previously, all Anthropic’s regular-clearance staff had visibility into the fully unredacted reports. Anthropic discloses and justifies this stating that some information may be both material to the risk assessment and sensitive enough to merit greater internal compartmentalization, especially given the company’s ongoing growth.

See Anthropic's redline v3.4.

OpenAI

Aug 18, 2026

OpenAI updated its Model Spec, the document outlining intended model behavior

View details

xAI

Aug 17, 2026

xAI updated Grok 4.6's model card after release. A changelog was included.

View details

Google

Aug 14, 2026

Google updated its Gemini 3.7 Flash model card after publication, making changes to language in the “Key Results for Gemini 3.7 Flash” column in the Frontier Safety Assessment section

View details

OpenAI

Aug 3, 2026

OpenAI updated its system card for two of its models: GPT 5.6 and GPT Live.

View details

Anthropic

Jul 24, 2026

Anthropic updated its Frontier Compliance Framework.

View details

xAI

Jul 20, 2026

xAI made changes throughout the model card for Grok 4.5, including some that appear to be persistent errors

View details

Frequently asked questions

Have more questions? Our team is happy to help, contact us.

What does The Midas Project do?
What does your name mean?
Who is behind The Midas Project?
Are you anti-AI?
How can I contribute?
How can I get in touch?