Watchtower

Watchtower tracks when AI companies change their safety policies — and when they break them.

OpenAI

OpenAI published a new system card for GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, covering new versions of the two models available in the basic ChatGPT interface.

Moderate
Change

OpenAI

Oct 7, 2026

OpenAI published a new system card on Oct. 7 for GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, covering new versions of the two models available in the basic ChatGPT interface. It makes a distinction between these new versions and the previous GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, described by Appendix A of the GPT-6 Astra system card, which are still available in Codex and via ChatGPT Work. The versions detailed in this system card are referred to as GPT-6 Sol (October) and GPT-6 Luna (October). 

Many evaluations are changed or not included between Appendix A and the new system card. For many that remain the same, GPT-6 Sol (October) and GPT-6 Luna (October) are benchmarked against GPT-5.6 Sol (August) and GPT-5.6 Luna (August), making it difficult to compare results against the evaluations of these models found in Appendix A of the GPT-6 Astra system card.

Both models retain the “High” capability rating in Cybersecurity and Biological/Chemical domains, and below High in AI self-improvement. On “Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting,” a Biological capability evaluation, GPT-6 Luna (October) crossed a High bio threshold the September version didn’t, moving from a score of 69.2% in September to 94.0% in this card.

Despite this, the card repeats a sentence from the previous Appendix A, stating that Critical testing “was not required for GPT-6 Luna because it scored below GPT-5.6 Sol on all High capability evaluations.” This claim is not true for GPT-6 Luna (October) due to the jump on its Tacit Knowledge score. Critical Biological testing for GPT-6 Luna (October) was still performed, with Luna scoring below the threshold on the three evaluations. 

In safety evaluations, GPT-6 Sol (October) and GPT-6 Luna (October) both handled harmful requests less safely than its September versions, although fewer benign requests were refused.

In alignment evaluations, the card contains a new caveat. OpenAI observed the models “cite the synthetic nature of this evaluation as justification for the performance of improper actions.”

This is not an exhaustive list of the differences between the two cards.

Meta

Oct 23, 2026

Meta quietly updated Wonder’s model card nearly two weeks after the model’s release, with still no sign of a safety and preparedness report for the model.

View details

OpenAI

Oct 21, 2026

OpenAI updated its Usage policies. The new policies will go into effect on Nov. 20.

View details

Google

Oct 13, 2026

Google launched Gemini 4 Argon along with the first “full” safety and preparedness report made under its Frontier Safety Framework (v3.1), published in April 2026.

View details

Meta

Oct 12, 2026

Meta publicly launched Muse Wonder with a 13-page model card and without concurrently publishing a safety and preparedness report.

View details

Meta

Oct 2, 2026

Meta updates and renames its safety framework from the "Advanced AI Scaling Framework" (v2) to the "Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework" (v2.1).

View details

OpenAI

Sep 29, 2026

OpenAI updated the GPT-6 Astra system card to include information about Dots, an always-on agent powered by GPT-6 Astra.

View details

Frequently asked questions

Have more questions? Our team is happy to help, contact us.

What does The Midas Project do?
What does your name mean?
Who is behind The Midas Project?
Are you anti-AI?
How can I contribute?
How can I get in touch?